Why Harris won't mention China

In the complex ballet of international politics, the dance between the United States and China is one of the most intricate and closely watched. The relationship between these two global powers encompasses a wide array of issues, from trade and technology to human rights and global security. Yet, amidst the swirl of diplomatic discussions and geopolitical strategies, Vice President Kamala Harris has adopted a notable stance—or rather, a notable silence—when it comes to addressing China directly. This strategic silence underscores a stark contrast in approaches between candidates and political figures regarding one of the most significant bilateral relationships in contemporary international affairs. The United States and China are entwined in a relationship that could be best described as a strategic rivalry, marked by intense competition across economic, technological, and military domains. At the same time, this relationship is punctuated by periods of cooperation and collaboration on issues of mutual interest, such as climate change and global health. The delicate balance between competition and cooperation requires nuanced diplomacy, a fact that has informed the communication strategies of U.S. political figures and candidates when it comes to China. Vice President Harris's approach to China, characterized by her reluctance to mention the country explicitly in various speeches and public appearances, is a tactical decision rather than an oversight. This reticence can be interpreted in several ways. First, it may reflect an intentional effort to de-escalate tensions between the United States and China, avoiding any remarks that could be construed as confrontational or antagonistic. In international diplomacy, words carry weight